Isolation of Osteoprogenitors from Human Jaw Periosteal Cells: A Comparison of Two Magnetic Separation Methods
dc.contributor.author | Olbrich, Marcus | |
dc.contributor.author | Rieger, Melanie | |
dc.contributor.author | Reinert, Siegmar | |
dc.contributor.author | Alexander, Dorothea | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2012-10-26T20:35:40Z | |
dc.date.available | 2012-10-26T20:35:40Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2012-10-19 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | PLoS One. 2012 Oct 19; 7(10):e47176 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 1932-6203 | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1371/journal.pone.0047176 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10675.2/836 | |
dc.description.abstract | Human jaw periosteum tissue contains osteoprogenitors that have potential for tissue engineering applications in oral and maxillofacial surgeries. To isolate osteoprogenitor cells from heterogeneous cell populations, we used the specific mesenchymal stem cell antigen-1 (MSCA-1) antibody and compared two magnetic separation methods. We analyzed the obtained MSCA-1+ and MSCA-1â fractions in terms of purity, yield of positive/negative cells and proliferative and mineralization potentials. The analysis of cell viability after separation revealed that the EasySep method yielded higher viability rates, whereas the flow cytometry results showed a higher purity for the MACS-separated cell fractions. The mineralization capacity of the osteogenic induced MSCA-1+ cells compared with the MSCA-1â controls using MACS was 5-fold higher, whereas the same comparison after EasySep showed no significant differences between both fractions. By analyzing cell proliferation, we detected a significant difference between the proliferative potential of the osteogenic cells versus untreated cells after the MACS and EasySep separations. The differentiated cells after MACS separation adjusted their proliferative capacity, whereas the EasySep-separated cells failed to do so. The protein expression analysis showed small differences between the two separation methods. Our findings suggest that MACS is a more suitable separation method to isolate osteoprogenitors from the entire jaw periosteal cell population. | |
dc.subject | Research Article | en_US |
dc.subject | Biology | en_US |
dc.subject | Anatomy and Physiology | en_US |
dc.subject | Physiological Processes | en_US |
dc.subject | Biomineralization | en_US |
dc.subject | Biochemistry | en_US |
dc.subject | Metabolism | en_US |
dc.subject | Bone and Mineral Metabolism | en_US |
dc.subject | Biotechnology | en_US |
dc.subject | Tissue Engineering | en_US |
dc.subject | Developmental Biology | en_US |
dc.subject | Cell Differentiation | en_US |
dc.subject | Molecular Cell Biology | en_US |
dc.subject | Cellular Types | en_US |
dc.subject | Stem Cells | en_US |
dc.subject | Adult Stem Cells | en_US |
dc.subject | Cell Growth | en_US |
dc.subject | Medicine | en_US |
dc.subject | Anatomy and Physiology | en_US |
dc.subject | Physiological Processes | en_US |
dc.subject | Biomineralization | en_US |
dc.title | Isolation of Osteoprogenitors from Human Jaw Periosteal Cells: A Comparison of Two Magnetic Separation Methods | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.identifier.pmcid | PMC3477152 | en_US |
dc.contributor.corporatename | Department of Pathology | |
dc.contributor.corporatename | College of Graduate Studies | |
refterms.dateFOA | 2019-04-10T00:59:17Z | |
html.description.abstract | Human jaw periosteum tissue contains osteoprogenitors that have potential for tissue engineering applications in oral and maxillofacial surgeries. To isolate osteoprogenitor cells from heterogeneous cell populations, we used the specific mesenchymal stem cell antigen-1 (MSCA-1) antibody and compared two magnetic separation methods. We analyzed the obtained MSCA-1+ and MSCA-1â fractions in terms of purity, yield of positive/negative cells and proliferative and mineralization potentials. The analysis of cell viability after separation revealed that the EasySep method yielded higher viability rates, whereas the flow cytometry results showed a higher purity for the MACS-separated cell fractions. The mineralization capacity of the osteogenic induced MSCA-1+ cells compared with the MSCA-1â controls using MACS was 5-fold higher, whereas the same comparison after EasySep showed no significant differences between both fractions. By analyzing cell proliferation, we detected a significant difference between the proliferative potential of the osteogenic cells versus untreated cells after the MACS and EasySep separations. The differentiated cells after MACS separation adjusted their proliferative capacity, whereas the EasySep-separated cells failed to do so. The protein expression analysis showed small differences between the two separation methods. Our findings suggest that MACS is a more suitable separation method to isolate osteoprogenitors from the entire jaw periosteal cell population. |