Hdl Handle:
http://hdl.handle.net/10675.2/316706
Title:
Collaboration vs. Individualism: What Is Better for the Rising Academic?
Authors:
Kemp, Andrew T.
Abstract:
In academia, scholarship and research productivity is the lifeblood of success. The question is, “What is the best way to be productive and more forward in a academic career—collaboration or individualism?” Obviously, the final choice is personal. However, for the purpose of this paper, the two sides will be discussed regarding the strengths and weaknesses of each avenue. Recommendations regarding the viability of collaboration and competition will be discussed in relation to personal attributes, career goals, and rank. In addition, a new methodology, tentatively called Layered Narrative, will be piloted with this project.
Affiliation:
Department of Teacher Education
Citation:
The Qualitative Report 2013 Volume 18, Article 100, 1-8
Publisher:
Nova Southeastern University
Journal:
The Qualitative Report
Issue Date:
16-Dec-2013
URI:
http://hdl.handle.net/10675.2/316706
Additional Links:
http://www.nova.edu/ssss/QR/QR18/kemp100.pdf
Type:
Article
Language:
en_US
Appears in Collections:
Department of Teacher Education: Faculty Research and Presentations

Full metadata record

DC FieldValue Language
dc.contributor.authorKemp, Andrew T.en
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-09T15:59:23Z-
dc.date.available2014-05-09T15:59:23Z-
dc.date.issued2013-12-16-
dc.identifier.citationThe Qualitative Report 2013 Volume 18, Article 100, 1-8en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10675.2/316706-
dc.description.abstractIn academia, scholarship and research productivity is the lifeblood of success. The question is, “What is the best way to be productive and more forward in a academic career—collaboration or individualism?” Obviously, the final choice is personal. However, for the purpose of this paper, the two sides will be discussed regarding the strengths and weaknesses of each avenue. Recommendations regarding the viability of collaboration and competition will be discussed in relation to personal attributes, career goals, and rank. In addition, a new methodology, tentatively called Layered Narrative, will be piloted with this project.en
dc.language.isoen_USen
dc.publisherNova Southeastern Universityen
dc.relation.urlhttp://www.nova.edu/ssss/QR/QR18/kemp100.pdfen
dc.subjectPromotion and Tenureen
dc.subjectCollaborationen
dc.subjectIndividual Achievementen
dc.subjectResearch and Scholarshipen
dc.subjectLayered Narrativeen
dc.titleCollaboration vs. Individualism: What Is Better for the Rising Academic?en_US
dc.typeArticleen
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Teacher Educationen
dc.identifier.journalThe Qualitative Reporten
All Items in Scholarly Commons are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.