Hdl Handle:
http://hdl.handle.net/10675.2/307160
Title:
Authentic Assessment in the Library Classroom
Authors:
Baker, Camilla B.
Abstract:
Typical survey instruments used in library classrooms tend to place more emphasis on presenter performance than on student learning. The uses of teacher evaluation surveys are clear for personnel evaluative purposes. What is less clear is whether the effort expended on library instruction is worth the time invested in it, when framed in the context of student outcomes. In other words, is librarian performance in the classroom more important than student learning? The use of active learning techniques in library classrooms focuses attention on the materials at hand, often in ways that lectures and demonstrations cannot. This paper will define the attributes of authentic assessment, and explain how this type of assessment can be used in a library classroom, even a single session, once a semester, in order to put more emphasis on student learning, using the exercise itself to shape the expected student outcomes. Examination of a sample of completed student questions after such a class showed that students need more emphasis in two outcome areas, documentation and moving successfully from identification of desired items to retrieval of those items. These are areas where students often need extra assistance, but it can be challenging to provide that assistance in a single class where other outcomes also compete for both the students’ and teacher’s attention. However, a stronger focus on student learning creates a better measure of the value of the class than does a survey more suited to a performance evaluation.
Affiliation:
Reese Library
Publisher:
Georgia Regents University
Issue Date:
23-Aug-2013
URI:
http://hdl.handle.net/10675.2/307160
Type:
Presentation; Working Paper
Language:
en_US
Appears in Collections:
University Libraries: Faculty Research and Presentations

Full metadata record

DC FieldValue Language
dc.contributor.authorBaker, Camilla B.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2013-12-18T20:39:05Z-
dc.date.available2013-12-18T20:39:05Z-
dc.date.issued2013-08-23-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10675.2/307160-
dc.description.abstractTypical survey instruments used in library classrooms tend to place more emphasis on presenter performance than on student learning. The uses of teacher evaluation surveys are clear for personnel evaluative purposes. What is less clear is whether the effort expended on library instruction is worth the time invested in it, when framed in the context of student outcomes. In other words, is librarian performance in the classroom more important than student learning? The use of active learning techniques in library classrooms focuses attention on the materials at hand, often in ways that lectures and demonstrations cannot. This paper will define the attributes of authentic assessment, and explain how this type of assessment can be used in a library classroom, even a single session, once a semester, in order to put more emphasis on student learning, using the exercise itself to shape the expected student outcomes. Examination of a sample of completed student questions after such a class showed that students need more emphasis in two outcome areas, documentation and moving successfully from identification of desired items to retrieval of those items. These are areas where students often need extra assistance, but it can be challenging to provide that assistance in a single class where other outcomes also compete for both the students’ and teacher’s attention. However, a stronger focus on student learning creates a better measure of the value of the class than does a survey more suited to a performance evaluation.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen
dc.publisherGeorgia Regents Universityen_US
dc.subjectinformation literacyen_US
dc.subjectauthentic assessmenten_US
dc.subjectlibrary instructionen_US
dc.subjectactive learningen_US
dc.titleAuthentic Assessment in the Library Classroomen_US
dc.typePresentationen
dc.typeWorking Paperen
dc.contributor.departmentReese Libraryen_US
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License
Creative Commons
All Items in Scholarly Commons are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.